Flying through
these airports? Don’t bother looking around.
From February 2010 By
Karrie Jacobs
We know, we know:
about 90 percent of the world’s airports - from jam-packed hubs like Frankfurt
to dusty outposts like Muscat,
Oman - could easily
compete for the title of world’s ugliest. After all, while each beautiful
airport is beautiful in its own way, the ugly ones blend together in a fog of
beige paint and low-hanging acoustic-tile ceilings. Some airports,
however, stand out as particularly egregious. And in the course of narrowing
our list - with help from an unscientific survey of design-savvy frequent
fliers - a few things became clear. First, the worst offenders are ugly by
choice rather than necessity: certain airports, like those in Bali and Sofia, Bulgaria,
seem to have gone out of their way to acquire the uncanny placelessness that
typifies the modern airport.
Second, pretty much
everyone loathes the airport they use the most. For New Yorkers, that’s JFK. “I
am sure there are worse airports, but New York
should have one of the best,” argues Paola Antonelli, design curator for the Museum of Modern Art. For Angelenos, it’s LAX:
“spread out, incoherent, and mean,” complains Silver Lake–based photo rep Maren
Levinson. Frederico Duarte, a tastemaker from Lisbon, decries the faux granite
and giant Martini & Rossi ads of his hometown airport, while architect
Johanna Grawunder, who regularly commutes between San Francisco and Milan,
issued a cri de coeur about Milan’s Linate. This local loathing
makes sense. Not only do travelers hate returning time and again to such
chronic dysfunctionality and overwhelming dinginess, they’re also embarrassed
that this is how others first encounter their beloved cities.






















