The road to Princess Diana's death in a 1997 car crash may
have begun long before she even got into that Mercedes. Sources say that the
real cause of the crash was actually the Royal Family and that the driver,
Henri Paul, could have been drugged, and that bright flashing lights were used
to impair the driver's vision of the dangerous, paparazzi-filled streets. Then
came what could be incontrovertible proof of a plot: a rumored letter, written
by Diana to her butler, Paul Burrell, claiming that the Royal Family saw her as
an "inconvenient woman" and that they were planning some sort of car
accident, which would pave the way for Charles to marry again. Burrell admitted
to copying passages from Diana's private correspondence but denied secretly
holding onto the note, according to The Daily Mail. Though an inquest into Di's
death offered no definitive proof of foul play, Burrell's note hangs in British
minds.
At the close of the 19th century, Prince Albert Victor, aka
Prince Eddy, was next in line for the throne - to the displeasure of many. Not
only was Eddy a suspected bisexual, but he had had an affair with a (gasp)
Roman Catholic shop girl named Annie Crook, which resulted in a child, one
possible born out of wedlock. Either way, Queen Victoria was displeased with her future
son's associations and instructed her physician, Sir William Gull, to
"take care of it." He brought Crook to a hospital where she was
"treated" to the point of being institutionalized for the rest of her
life. This began a domino effect. All the women who were friends with Annie
needed to be eliminated to keep the situation a secret. Dr. Gull may have
created Jack the Ripper and carried on savagely silencing the women under the
cloak of a vicious serial killer. An alternate theory suggests that Dr. Gull
was aided by the Masons and became their ritual killer.
British Royals Are Behind Presidential Assassinations
A pamphlet issued in December 1994 by The New Federalist
newspaper claims that the British Royals have been behind all of America's
presidential assassinations. The pamphlet claims that the assassinated
presidents were verging on being too successful in their efforts to advance the
U.S.
and the British were not pleased with the competition. The author argues that
in each killing, the rise of the Vice President into power compromised the
efforts of the previous president, thereby hindering the forward movement of
the U.S.
and benefitting the ruling power of the crown.
The Royals are Reptiles
If you've ever wondered how Queen Elizabeth is still alive
and in power, here's the answer: the Royal Family are all shape-shifting lizard
people. Conspiracy master David Icke claims that the Royal Family are not
humans but rather alien reptiles who have taken on human form in an effort to
enslave humanity. Icke claims to have taped an interview with Christine
Fitzgerald, a confidant of Princess Diana's, saying that Diana had told her
that the Royal Family hasn't died in ages - they have
"metamorphosised" by rebuilding flesh, much in the same manner that a
lizard re-grows a tail. She went on to explain that the Queen Mother is
"Chief Toad." The reign of the lizard people supposedly stretches
beyond England:
lizard people have infilitrated the highest levels of power in every country.
Coburg
Family Conspiracy
Sure, the Royal Family may be a group of austere
palace-dwellers now but their roots are far from Buckingham - in fact, they're
closer to the fields of Germany.
In the early twentieth century, the Saxe-Coburg-Saalfield family went from
ruling a small, inconsequential German fiefdom to presiding over thirteen royal
families, all thanks to the scheming of Leopold Coburg and Augusta, his mother.
In The Coburg Conspiracy, author Richard theorizes how the Coburgs could have
pulled off such a meteoric acension to power. It began, he says, with one key
marriage of Leopold to the daughter of Prince Regent, orchestrated by the Henry
Higgens-esque Mother Coburg, who groomed her family to act and become
aristocrats, suggesting that kings and queens are made - not born.
Kate and William: Blood Relatives Of A Tyrant?
Kate Middleton's lineage is not as common as we've been led
to believe. The Daily Mail revealed that her blood can be traced back to a
knight in Queen Elizabeth II's court - but so can her future husband's. Kate
and Will are kissing cousins, connected by Sir Thomas Leighton, a sadistic
tyrant who wielded an iron fist over the island of Guernsey.
He jailed those who questioned him without trial, was an enthusiastic supporter
of drawing and quartering and seems to have enjoyed blood a little too much.
British historians have, until now, chosen to ignore his existence but now the
truth is out about ancestors of the royal couple. Many wonder why this was kept
under wraps for so long and what it means for the future of the crown.
Is the Queen Related to the Prophet Mohammed?
The Queen has a trump card in the conflict in the Middle East. Harold B. Brooks-Baker (publishing director
of Burke's Peerage, the genealogical guide to royal lineage) told United Press
International "that the blood of Mohammed flows in the veins of the queen.
However, all Moslem religious leaders are proud of this fact." The
connection can be made through the Arab kings of Seville
who once ruled Spain.
Through marriage and children, their blood was passed to kings of Portugal and Castille and through them to King
Edward IV of England.
Could this be England's
secret weapon?
Royal Family Members Were Nazi Sympathizers
When Prince Harry jokingly donned a Nazi uniform in 2005, he
may not have known he was saluting his ancestors. In 1938 King Edward VIII
abdicated the throne when he chose marriage to a twice-divorced American over
the crown — or so we've been told. Blogger Ryan Paul and other observers
believe that he stepped down due to his Nazis sympathies, having developed
friendly relations with Hitler, and that his behind-the-scenes support
continued long after he was dethroned. In 1995, the Washington Times revealed
that Edward - later the Duke of Windsor - communicated with Nazis in both Spain
and Portugal with the intent to ruin Churchill, dispose of his brother King
George VI and regain the throne. He is also rumored to have leaked Allied war
plans for the defense of Belgium.
Soon after that alleged leakage, Edward was relocated to the Bahamas where
he would be less of a threat to national safety.
Edward II Could Have Been Alive Long After His Supposed
Murder
King Edward II was not a great king. His reign was marred by
military defeats, internal fighting and loopy incompetence. He was accused of
sodomy by Bishop Adam Orleton, an ally of Queen Isabella who wanted (and
eventually took) King Edward's throne. It therefore came as no surprise to the
country when he was murdered in 1327. That is, he was allegedly murdered. In
fact, Edward (played by a young Ian McKellan onstage, above) could have still
been alive a decade after his apparent murder by an agent of the then ruling
Queen Isabella. Historian Ian Mortimer postulates that Edward in fact died in Italy around
1341, having escaped his imprisonment to live the remainder of his life in
exile. Many believed he was suffocated or strangled or had a red-hot poker
thrust into his anus. However, there was never any definitive chronicle of his
assassination - perhaps because it never happened.
The Babington Plot
Many of Queen Elizabeth I's subjects disapproved of her seat
on the throne, preffering her cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots, a Roman Catholic
who was second in line for the throne. Those who sought to restore England to the Catholic kingdom it was before
Henry VIII saw that the only way to do accomplish this would be to eliminate Elizabeth and bring Mary
to power. Elizabeth and her supporters were well aware of this and therefore
put Mary into the custody of a series of jailers for 18 years. But that was not
enough. In 1584, a Bond of Association was signed by Elizabeth's Privy Council, which said that
anyone in line for the throne would be executed if some one plotted against the
Queen on their behalf, giving the Queen's men cause to pounce on and execute
Mary.
King Arthur Was Actually Jesus?
The fascinating legend of King Arthur is rivaled only by the
stories of Jesus; could it be they were the same person? In his book King
Jesus, Ralph Ellis asserts that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were actually a
wealthy couple in possession of land and a private army. When the Romans wanted
to charge Jesus taxes, the Jews rebelled and lost, with Jesus exiled to a
fortress in England.
There, Jesus rose to power again, gaining disciples and the new name of King
Arthur. His disciples were known as the Twelve Knights of the Last Supper Table.
Could the tales of Arthur and his men simply be an unwritten book of the Bible? - by Justine Sterling
Source : http://www.trutv.com
No comments:
Post a Comment